Replaces the plain-text 열림/닫힘/병합됨 label on issue/PR list rows and detail headers with a compact colored badge, reusing the VisibilityBadge pattern TASK-039 established for 공개/비공개. OPEN reuses the app's green primaryContainer, CLOSED reuses the baseline errorContainer, MERGED reuses the teal tertiaryContainer -- all existing theme roles, so dark mode is handled automatically with no new hardcoded colors. Found while verifying issue/PR body rendering for real content (confirmed correct, no bug) during the design-review pass. Live-verified on-device in both light and dark mode. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
6.1 KiB
TASK-042: Colored status badges for issue/PR state (열림/닫힘/병합됨)
Status: implemented; all required checks pass; live-confirmed on the human product owner's device Owner: Claude Reviewer: Codex
Outcome
Design-review follow-up (continuing the "앱의 아이콘부터 해서 전체적으로 확인해보고 부족한 부분 고쳐줘"
pass from TASK-039). While verifying that issue/PR body text renders correctly for real content
(it does — confirmed against a real issue with a multi-paragraph body and an embedded code block),
noticed the 열림/닫힘/병합됨 state label next to each issue/PR — in both the list row and the detail
header — rendered as a plain, uncolored bodySmall line, visually no more prominent than the
#12 issue number sitting right next to it. Gitea's own web UI (and GitHub's, which established the
convention) colors this label so it reads at a glance while scanning a list. Replaced the plain text
with a compact colored badge, reusing the VisibilityBadge pattern TASK-039 already established for
공개/비공개 on the repository list.
Scope
- Included:
feature/workitems/WorkItemsScreen.kt— new privateStatusBadgecomposable (two overloads, one per state enum, sharing one color-agnostic rendering implementation) replacing the four plain-Textstate-label call sites:IssueRow,PullRequestRow,IssueDetailView,PullRequestDetailView. - Excluded:
NotificationsScreen.kt's own PR/이슈 state labels (a separate screen/composable, out of scope for this pass — noted below as a known limitation, not silently left inconsistent).ReviewStatelabels (승인/변경 요청/etc. onReviewRow) — these are a different kind of status with no obvious two/three-color GitHub/Gitea convention to borrow, left as plain text.
Design notes
- Reused existing theme roles instead of introducing new colors. OPEN gets
primaryContainer/onPrimaryContainer— the same greenVisibilityBadgealready uses for a public repository's affirmative state. CLOSED getserrorContainer/onErrorContainer— the baseline Material3 redTheme.ktdeliberately left untouched for exactly this kind of closed/removed state. MERGED — a third state GitHub/Gitea conventionally color purple, which this app's green/teal-accented theme has no role for — getstertiaryContainer/onTertiaryContainer(teal) rather than a one-off hardcoded color with no theme backing (and no dark-mode variant of its own to get wrong). - One rendering composable, two small color-mapping overloads.
IssueStateandPullRequestStateare different enums (PullRequestStatehas the extra MERGED case), so a singlewhencouldn't cover both — instead each enum gets its own thinStatusBadge(state, modifier)overload that maps to a container/content color pair and delegates to the same privateStatusBadge(label, container, content, modifier)for the actualSurface+Textrendering, keeping the visual treatment (rounded 4dp corner,labelSmall, 6dp/2dp padding) defined in exactly one place.
Acceptance criteria
- Issue list rows show a colored badge (not plain text) for 열림/닫힘.
- PR list rows show a colored badge for 열림/닫힘/병합됨.
- Issue detail header shows the same colored badge as its list row.
- PR detail header shows the same colored badge as its list row.
- Colors are pulled from the existing Material3 theme (no new hardcoded colors), so dark mode is handled automatically.
- Build, unit tests, and lint pass.
- Live-confirmed on the human product owner's device: PR list showing 병합됨 (teal) ×2 and 열림 (green) ×1 side by side; PR detail header showing the same teal 병합됨 badge; both re-confirmed unchanged under forced dark mode.
Required checks
./gradlew compileDebugKotlin compileDebugUnitTestKotlin testDebugUnitTest assembleDebug lintDebug
Evidence
feature/workitems/WorkItemsScreen.kt:StatusBadgecomposable (two state-typed overloads + one shared rendering implementation) added;IssueRow,PullRequestRow,IssueDetailView,PullRequestDetailVieweach call it in place of a plainText(stringResource(state.labelResource))../gradlew compileDebugKotlin compileDebugUnitTestKotlin testDebugUnitTest assembleDebug lintDebug: BUILD SUCCESSFUL, all unit tests passing (no test changes needed — this is a pure presentation change with no new branching logic to cover beyond what the enumwhens already exhaustively check at compile time), 0 lint errors.- Live device: installed over wireless
adb. Notifications → PostActivated 관련 추가 필요 이슈 detail: confirmed the issue body (multi-paragraph Korean text plus an indented C# code block) renders correctly end to end — this was the original investigation trigger, and it surfaced no bug on its own. RobotAutomationDevelopment-Dept/OC5-PilotLine-RectangleTypeWelder PR tab: #6/#5 both show a teal "병합됨" badge, #4 shows a green "열림" badge (screenshot); opened #6's detail view and confirmed the same teal badge appears in the header (screenshot). Forced dark mode (adb shell cmd uimode night yes) and reconfirmed the same PR list — both badge colors keep good contrast against the dark surface (screenshot) — then restorednight no.
Known limitations
NotificationsScreen.ktstill renders its own PR/이슈 상태 column as plain text — a second, separate location with the same visual gap this task fixed on the work-items screens. Not touched here to keep this change scoped to what was actually being reviewed; worth a follow-up pass.- Did not find a real CLOSED (닫힘) issue/PR with this fix installed to visually confirm the red badge
live — the CLOSED branch was exercised only via the existing 닫힘 rows seen in
NotificationsScreen(a different, unfixed screen) prior to this change. The color mapping itself (errorContainer/onErrorContainer) is the same theme role used unconditionally elsewhere in the app, so this is a low-risk gap, not left silently assumed away.
Review findings
None yet — pending Codex/human review.