# UBGitea development log

This is the append-only implementation and handoff record shared by Codex and Claude. Only the current task owner or assigned reviewer may append an entry, and agents never edit this file concurrently.

## 2026-08-25 — TASK-001

- Agent and role: Codex, implementer and integrator
- Commit/diff: `75aa5f8`
- Features implemented: Android Compose project bootstrap, Korean placeholder home screen, deterministic Gradle wrapper, unit-test and lint baseline.
- How it was implemented: One application module using Kotlin, Compose, Material 3, API 28 minimum, API 36 target, JDK 17, and version-catalog-managed dependencies.
- Files changed: Root Gradle configuration, `app/`, ADR-001, product and task documentation.
- Checks and results: Debug APK build passed; 1 unit test passed; lint passed; sensitive-pattern scan found no assigned secret.
- Review findings and resolutions: Independent review found no P0-P3 findings.
- Known limitations: No device/emulator launch; final icon and authentication were out of scope.
- Next recommended task: Repository browsing foundations.
- Next owner: Codex.

## 2026-08-25 — TASK-003

- Agent and role: Codex, implementer and integrator
- Commit/diff: `a2cc7d4`
- Features implemented: Immutable repository, branch, tree, file, commit and paging domain contracts; safe coordinate/ref/path validation; read-only repository interface and browse use cases.
- How it was implemented: Pure Kotlin domain models, defensive byte/list copies, shared pagination validation, Korean read-only placeholder state, and fake-adapter unit tests.
- Files changed: Domain model/repository/use-case packages, focused tests, home placeholder, product roadmap and TASK-003 through TASK-007 documents.
- Checks and results: Build passed; 22 unit tests passed; lint passed; sensitive-pattern and diff checks passed.
- Review findings and resolutions: Two P2 findings covering page output mutability and missing use-case boundary tests were fixed and independently re-reviewed; no findings remain.
- Known limitations: Live HTTP, authentication, navigation, content rendering, and device testing were out of scope.
- Next recommended task: OAuth protocol core followed by Android OAuth integration.
- Next owner: Codex.

## 2026-08-25 — TASK-002A

- Agent and role: Codex, implementer and integrator
- Commit/diff: `6da016c`
- Features implemented: OAuth client configuration, approved read-only scopes, fresh PKCE S256 verifier/state generation, authorization URL construction, exact redirect validation, transaction expiry, denial/success modeling, and strict callback query validation.
- How it was implemented: Pure Kotlin/JDK code with `SecureRandom`, SHA-256, unpadded Base64 URL encoding, RFC 7636 verifier grammar, deterministic query component encoding, constant-time state comparison, strict UTF-8 percent decoding, duplicate/ambiguous response rejection, saturating time boundaries, and redacted string representations for sensitive values.
- Files changed: `core/auth/protocol/`, matching protocol tests, ADR-002, TASK-002 umbrella, TASK-002A, and TASK-002B.
- Checks and results: Focused OAuth tests 21/21 passed; full unit tests 43/43 passed; debug APK build passed; Android lint passed; diff check passed; sensitive-pattern scan found no assigned secret/token/password/private key.
- Review findings and resolutions: P2 verifier grammar fixed with strict RFC character/length validation; P2 parameter pollution and malformed UTF-8 fixed with fail-closed parsing; P3 timestamp overflow fixed with saturating boundaries. Independent re-review found no remaining P0-P3 findings.
- Known limitations: System browser launch, App Link dispatch, code exchange, Keystore token vault, user identity, and real-server E2E are intentionally deferred to TASK-002B. E2E remains blocked by signing fingerprints and hosted `assetlinks.json`.
- Next recommended task: TASK-002B Android OAuth integration, completing locally testable browser/storage/exchange boundaries before the external E2E gate.
- Next owner: Codex.

## 2026-08-25 — TASK-011

- Agent and role: Codex, implementer and integrator
- Commit/diff: current TASK-011 working-tree diff; user-owned `assetlinks.json` excluded
- Features implemented: System-browser Gitea OAuth login, verified HTTPS App Link callback, PKCE code exchange without a client secret, Keystore-backed token storage and logout, authenticated identity check, and a paginated list of every repository visible to the account.
- How it was implemented: Exact callback validation reuses TASK-002A; pending verifier/state is consumed once; OkHttp runs asynchronously with cancellation/error propagation; Gson DTOs fail closed into typed API errors; `/api/v1/user` precedes bounded/deduplicated `/api/v1/user/repos`; Compose exposes localized signed-out, browser-waiting/cancel, loading, content, empty, offline, permission, expired-auth, callback, and server-error states.
- Files changed: Android manifest and extraction rules, network/auth/repository data layers, repository ViewModel/Compose screen, dependencies/resources, focused tests, and TASK-002B/004/005/011 status documentation.
- Checks and results: Debug APK build passed; 57 unit tests across 16 suites passed; Android lint passed; diff and sensitive-pattern checks passed; no WebView or production client secret exists.
- Review findings and resolutions: Browser cancellation dead-end, HTTP response-read exception handling, signed-in error recovery/logout, nullable DTO validation, immutable UI snapshots, and bounded pagination coverage were fixed. Final independent re-review reported no remaining P0/P1.
- Known limitations: No Android device is connected, so the hosted App Link, system-browser return, live account login, repository result, and device Keystore behavior require one manual E2E run on the target phone.
- Next recommended task: Install the debug APK on the target Android device and verify login plus the internal repository list; after that, begin branch browsing.
- Next owner: Human product owner for device E2E, then Codex.

## 2026-08-25 — TASK-011 device E2E closure

- Agent and role: Human product owner, device verifier; Codex, evidence recorder
- Verification performed: Installed application login against the production company Gitea and retrieval of the authenticated account's internal repository list.
- Result: System-browser OAuth, verified App Link return, authenticated API access, and repository-list rendering passed on the target device.
- Review status: Automated gates previously passed and final independent review reported no P0/P1; the remaining manual device gate is now closed.
- Task status: TASK-011 complete.
- Next recommended task: Add repository selection and branch listing.
- Next owner: Codex.

## 2026-08-25 — TASK-012

- Agent and role: Codex, workflow implementer
- Commit/diff: TASK-012 documentation diff
- Features implemented: Durable current-state and remaining-roadmap handoff, Claude working-style prompt, and bidirectional append-only question/answer mailboxes.
- How it was implemented: Writer-specific directories and immutable per-message files preserve the single-writer protocol; the roadmap orders work by frozen-contract dependencies and assigns one owner per task.
- Files changed: `handoff/`, TASK-006A status, TASK-012, collaboration documentation, and this log.
- Checks and results: Documentation paths, baseline commits, ownership, task dependencies, and mailbox cross-references inspected; no Android code or external infrastructure changed.
- Review findings and resolutions: Pending Claude read-only review of the handoff package.
- Known limitations: Mailboxes coordinate repository-based handoff and do not provide real-time notification; agents must inspect them at task start.
- Next recommended task: Claude implements TASK-006A only and hands its commit to Codex for review.
- Next owner: Claude.

## 2026-08-25 — TASK-012 review closure and activation

- Agent and role: Codex, finding resolver and handoff owner; Claude, independent read-only reviewer
- Commit/diff: reviewed package commit `57d1c09`; immutable activation ref `handoff/task-006a-ready`
- Findings resolved: Canonical delivery sequence now explicitly permits independent TASK-006A before the TASK-004/005 remainder; TASK-006A authorizes only its completion-log append; both mailbox directions share symmetric immutable templates and unique correction filenames; completed OAuth evidence is synchronized.
- Checks and results: Documentation cross-references and task dependencies inspected; `git diff --check` passed before activation; no Android production file or external infrastructure changed.
- Review result: No handoff activation occurs until the tag resolves to the committed metadata state. Claude checks out the tag, creates a `claude/` branch, implements TASK-006A only, and then stops for Codex review.
- Known limitation: Repository mailboxes are asynchronous and must be checked manually at task start.
- Next owner: Claude for TASK-006A.

## 2026-08-25 — TASK-006A implementation

- Agent and role: Claude, assigned feature implementer (writable scope limited to `feature/codebrowser/content/` and this task's evidence/log entries)
- Commit/diff: branch `claude/task-006a-ready` created from activation tag `handoff/task-006a-ready` (base `965d55d`); implementation adds `ContentClassification.kt`, `SourceContentClassifier.kt`, and `SourceContentClassifierTest.kt` under `feature/codebrowser/content/`
- Features implemented: Pure-Kotlin classifier that turns already-loaded `SourceContent` bytes into one of five immutable states — bounded text (with independent line/character truncation flags), binary, Git LFS pointer, unsupported encoding, or oversized — using caller-supplied positive byte/character/line limits.
- How it was implemented: Oversized input is rejected by raw byte count before any decoding; binary is detected by a raw NUL-byte scan; text decoding uses a strict UTF-8 `CharsetDecoder` with `CodingErrorAction.REPORT` for malformed and unmappable input so it never substitutes replacement characters; a Git LFS pointer is recognized only from the exact canonical `version` line followed by valid `oid sha256:<64 hex>` and `size <integer>` lines within the 1024-byte spec bound; remaining text is truncated independently by line count and character count with an explicit `isTruncated` flag. No shared domain, data, Gradle, manifest, or navigation file was modified; `RepositoryModels.kt`/`RepositoryPath.kt`/`RepositoryRef.kt` remain identical to contract-freeze commit `0929282`.
- Files changed: `app/src/main/java/com/ubisam/ubgitea/feature/codebrowser/content/ContentClassification.kt`, `app/src/main/java/com/ubisam/ubgitea/feature/codebrowser/content/SourceContentClassifier.kt`, `app/src/test/java/com/ubisam/ubgitea/feature/codebrowser/content/SourceContentClassifierTest.kt`, `tasks/006a-code-content-classifier.md` (evidence/status), this log entry.
- Checks and results: `./gradlew testDebugUnitTest --tests "com.ubisam.ubgitea.feature.codebrowser.content.*"` passed (25/25); `./gradlew assembleDebug testDebugUnitTest lintDebug --rerun-tasks` passed (82 unit tests repository-wide, 0 failures; lint 0 errors, 22 pre-existing warnings unchanged from TASK-001 baseline); `git diff --check` clean; sensitive-pattern scan of changed files found no secret/token/password/private-key markers.
- Review findings and resolutions: None yet — pending Codex read-only review.
- Known limitations: No Android device/emulator was used, since this task has no Android framework dependency (pure JVM-testable Kotlin); static formatting/check task remains unconfigured for the module.
- Next recommended task: Codex reviews this commit read-only per `docs/workstreams.md` cross-review rules; TASK-006 UI remains blocked until Codex freezes the TASK-004/005 contracts.
- Next owner: Codex, for review.

## 2026-08-26 — TASK-006A Codex integration review

- Agent and role: Codex, integrator and reviewer
- Commit/diff: Claude commit `979729a`, integrated as `4f5faf3`, plus Codex Unicode-boundary fix
- Review findings and resolutions: One P2 was found: UTF-16 substring truncation could split an emoji or another supplementary character into a lone surrogate. Rendering now counts and truncates Unicode code points, with a focused emoji regression test.
- Checks and results: Focused classifier, full unit-test, debug-build, lint, diff, and sensitive-pattern gates are rerun after the fix.
- Known limitations: TASK-006 remains blocked on completion and freeze of the TASK-004/005 API and navigation contracts.
- Next recommended task: Codex completes the TASK-004 branch/tag/tree/file API remainder, then TASK-005 repository selection and branch browsing.
- Next owner: Codex.

## 2026-08-26 — TASK-004

- Agent and role: Codex, implementer and integrator
- Commit/diff: TASK-004 working diff following `ed2121b`
- Features implemented: Authenticated read-only repository, branch, tag, directory-tree, Base64 source-file, and commit API adapter with immutable pagination.
- How it was implemented: OkHttp `HttpUrl` encodes every owner/repository/path segment and ref/path query independently; private nullable Gson DTOs validate before mapping; bearer-token access is injected; contents arrays are locally paged; file type/path/encoding/size are verified; HTTP and network outcomes use typed failures.
- Files changed: Core network failures, repository data adapter/tests, tag domain/use-case contracts, HTTP decision ADR, Gradle test dependency, TASK-004 evidence, and this log.
- Checks and results: Focused in-memory and MockWebServer tests passed; repository-wide debug build and lint passed; 90 unit tests across 19 suites passed with zero failures/errors; diff check and focused sensitive-pattern scan passed.
- Review findings and resolutions: Self-review added page-overflow protection, returned-file path matching, nullable size validation, Unicode-safe prior classifier integration, and a real local HTTP boundary test.
- Known limitations: Gitea contents has no server-side pagination, so later directory pages repeat the request and slice the immutable returned snapshot locally.
- Review status: Codex completed source/contract self-review. Independent review is deferred while the user has assigned the serial implementation stream to Codex and must be completed before TASK-006 contract freeze.
- Next recommended task: TASK-005 repository selection and branch/tag browsing UI.
- Next owner: Codex.

## 2026-08-26 — TASK-005

- Agent and role: Codex, implementer and integrator.
- Commit/diff: TASK-005 working diff following `8a47d30`; the exact completion commit is recorded after commit creation.
- Features implemented: Repository selection plus repository-scoped branch and tag browsing, default/protected/selected reference indicators, abbreviated commit IDs, refresh, retry, logout, and deterministic back navigation.
- How it was implemented: A unidirectional immutable ViewModel state machine consumes the TASK-004 read-only browser contract, loads bounded pages serially, deduplicates references by name, cancels replaced work, and restores the cached repository-list snapshot. Small gateway interfaces make authentication and repository restoration JVM-testable without Android framework construction.
- Files changed: Repository Compose/ViewModel/presenter and tests, MainActivity callback wiring, testable authentication/repository gateway boundaries, localized repository strings, and TASK-005 evidence.
- Checks and results: Focused presenter/ViewModel tests passed; repository-wide debug build, 96 unit tests across 21 suites, and Android lint passed; diff and focused sensitive-pattern checks passed.
- Review findings and resolutions: Self-review added immutable reference snapshots, operation cancellation on back navigation, typed reference errors retaining repository context, and ViewModel tests for selection/restoration/error behavior. Independent review is deferred while Codex owns the serial stream.
- Known limitations: No device/emulator interaction test was available in this work cycle. The reviewed contract-freeze checkbox remains open until independent integration review.
- Next recommended task: TASK-006 directory navigation and bounded source-file viewing using the TASK-004 API and reviewed TASK-006A classifier.
- Next owner: Codex for continuous implementation; Claude may later perform the independent review when re-enabled by the product owner.

## 2026-08-26 — TASK-006

- Agent and role: Codex, temporary feature implementer and integrator while Claude work is paused.
- Commit/diff: TASK-006 working diff based on TASK-005 commit `bbbff77`; exact implementation commit recorded after creation.
- Features implemented: Explicit branch/tag tree browsing, deterministic breadcrumbs and back navigation, directory/file selection, bounded selectable/copyable source text, and dedicated binary/LFS/unsupported-encoding/oversized/symlink/submodule fallbacks.
- How it was implemented: A feature-owned immutable ViewModel state machine passes repository coordinates, ref, and validated path to every TASK-004 read-only request. It consumes bounded pages serially, cancels replaced work, retains file-vs-directory retry intent, and delegates byte classification to the reviewed TASK-006A component. The Compose screen keeps repository/ref/path visible and virtualizes directory rows.
- Files changed: Code-browser ViewModel, navigation helper, Compose screen, Korean resources, focused tests, MainActivity feature wiring, selected-reference handoff, and TASK-006 evidence.
- Checks and results: Focused code-browser tests passed; repository-wide debug build, 102 unit tests across 23 suites, and Android lint passed; diff and focused sensitive-pattern/read-only scans passed.
- Review findings and resolutions: Self-review fixed root-loading back behavior, file retry incorrectly becoming a directory request, file breadcrumbs attempting directory loads, configuration-change screen loss, and non-virtualized directory rendering. Independent review is deferred.
- Known limitations: Physical-device interaction has not yet been rerun. TASK-005's reviewed contract-freeze criterion remains open pending later independent review.
- Next recommended task: TASK-009 immutable history/change/diff API contracts, followed by TASK-007 read-only history and change UI.
- Next owner: Codex for the continuous serial stream.

## 2026-08-26 — TASK-004/005/006 independent review and freeze

- Agent and role: Claude, independent reviewer per `handoff/claude-master-handoff.md`'s "review and freeze" first action; human product owner authorized Claude as incoming primary implementer with handback to Codex kept possible at any time.
- Commit/diff: reviewed `8a47d30` (TASK-004), `bbbff77` (TASK-005), `16c46a5` (TASK-006) read-only, then fixed one finding on branch `claude/review-005-006-freeze` from `16c46a5`.
- Review scope and method: Independently reran `assembleDebug testDebugUnitTest lintDebug --rerun-tasks` (did not trust the recorded evidence alone) and read `GiteaRepositoryBrowserApi.kt`, `HttpTransport.kt`, `RepositoryListViewModel.kt`, `RepositoryReferencePresenter.kt`, `CodeBrowserViewModel.kt`, `CodeBrowserNavigation.kt`, and `MainActivity.kt` against the master handoff's checklist: races/cancellation, root back, rotation restoration, URL encoding, immutable snapshots, page overflow, and 404/409/422 mapping. TASK-009's commit was not yet available (still uncommitted upstream) and was excluded from this pass per human product owner direction.
- Findings:
  - P2 (fixed): `core/network/HttpTransport.kt` `requireSuccess()` mapped 401/403/404/429/5xx but let 409 and 422 fall through to the generic `ApiFailure.InvalidResponse`, which would have blocked TASK-007's planned `conflict`/`unprocessable` UDF states. Added `ApiFailure.Conflict`/`ApiFailure.Unprocessable` and extended `GiteaRepositoryBrowserApiTest`'s status-mapping test.
  - P3 (recorded, not fixed): `CodeBrowserViewModel` runs JSON parsing, Base64 decoding, directory sort/dedupe, and the TASK-006A classifier on `viewModelScope`'s Main dispatcher after the network suspend point resumes. Not blocking; recommended for TASK-016 (release hardening) given its low-end-device and large-content scope.
  - Everything else checked (races/cancellation, root back via `BackHandler` in both screens, immutable snapshot wrapping, page-overflow bounds, URL component encoding) verified correct with no finding.
- Checks and results after the fix: `assembleDebug testDebugUnitTest lintDebug --rerun-tasks` BUILD SUCCESSFUL, 102 unit tests across 23 suites, 0 failures/errors, 0 lint errors; `git diff --check` clean; sensitive-pattern scan clean (one match was a test asserting `client_secret` absence, not a leak).
- Task evidence updated: TASK-004, TASK-005, and TASK-006 each record this closure. TASK-005's "reviewed completion commit is TASK-006's contract-freeze base" and TASK-006's "evidence records the exact reviewed TASK-005 contract-freeze commit" checkboxes are both closed. TASK-009's corresponding freeze checkbox remains open pending its own commit and review.
- Known limitations: No physical device was available, so device-interaction checks named in TASK-005/006 remain deferred, unchanged from before this review.
- Next recommended task: TASK-007 (history and change UI), per the ordered backlog in `handoff/claude-master-handoff.md`, once TASK-009 lands and is reviewed; TASK-010 (work-item API contracts) ownership is transferred to Claude per the same handoff.
- Next owner: Claude, continuing the primary implementer role with handback to Codex available at any time by flipping a task's Owner field back and picking up from its last recorded commit.

## 2026-08-26 — TASK-017: recent-push sort, paged repository list, last-pushed branch

- Agent and role: Claude, feature implementer, per human product owner priority-1 request in conversation on 2026-08-26.
- Commit/diff: branch `claude/task-017-recent-push-favorites` from `fdda164`; new task file `tasks/017-repository-list-recent-push.md`.
- Features implemented: Repository list is now sorted most-recently-pushed-first (server-side `sort=updated&order=desc`, correct across page boundaries), paged 5 at a time with explicit previous/next navigation, and each visible repository independently shows (and can retry) its most recently committed branch.
- How it was implemented: Added `updatedAtEpochMillis` to `RepositorySummary` and `commitAtEpochMillis` to `BranchSummary`, mapped from Gitea's `updated_at` and branch `commit.timestamp`. Replaced the legacy eager-loading `RepositoryListApi`/`AccessibleRepositoriesGateway` with the existing paged `GiteaRepositoryBrowser.listRepositories`. `RepositoryListViewModel` now tracks a page number and launches one cancellable job per visible row to fetch and compare that repository's branch timestamps; jobs are cancelled on page change/refresh/navigation-away and resumed (not restarted) when returning via back-navigation.
- Files changed: `domain/model/RepositoryModels.kt`, `data/repositories/GiteaRepositoryBrowserApi.kt`, removed `data/repositories/RepositoryListApi.kt` and its test, `feature/repositories/RepositoryListViewModel.kt`, `feature/repositories/RepositoryListScreen.kt`, `MainActivity.kt`, `strings_repositories.xml`, associated tests, `tasks/017-repository-list-recent-push.md`.
- Checks and results: `assembleDebug testDebugUnitTest lintDebug --rerun-tasks` BUILD SUCCESSFUL — 105 unit tests across 22 suites, 0 failures/errors, 0 lint errors; `git diff --check` clean (CRLF notices only); sensitive-pattern scan clean.
- Review findings and resolutions: Self-review caught and fixed two issues before they shipped: (1) page-navigation/refresh calls had no `try`/`catch`, which would have crashed the app on any network failure during `nextPage()`/`previousPage()`/`refreshRepositories()` — wrapped in the same error-mapping pattern used elsewhere; (2) a repository with no default branch (a real Gitea state for empty repos) would have failed the entire page load via the existing fail-closed `.required()` mapping — `defaultBranch` is now nullable at the domain level, matching how the UI already handled it. Independent Codex review is pending.
- Known limitations: No physical device was available to verify page navigation and per-row branch loading interactively. Timestamp ties between two branches resolve deterministically but arbitrarily (first match kept).
- Next recommended task: TASK-018 (Gitea-star favorites tab), already scoped in `tasks/018-favorites-gitea-star.md`, is next; Codex review of TASK-017 can happen in parallel since it touches non-overlapping paths once merged.
- Next owner: Codex for read-only review of TASK-017; Claude continuing to TASK-018.

## 2026-08-26 — TASK-018: Favorites tab backed by Gitea star

- Agent and role: Claude, feature implementer, per human product owner priority-1 request in conversation on 2026-08-26 (same request as TASK-017).
- Commit/diff: same branch as TASK-017 (`claude/task-017-recent-push-favorites`), committed as a separate commit on top of it; new task file `tasks/018-favorites-gitea-star.md`, ADR `docs/decisions/004-favorites-write-user-scope.md`.
- Features implemented: A user can star a repository from the main list and unstar it from a new Favorites tab, which shows only their starred repositories with the same paging/loading/empty/error states as the main list.
- How it was implemented: Added `write:user` to the app's requested OAuth scopes and replaced `OAuthClientConfig`'s "every scope must be read-only" guard with "every scope must be read-only or in an explicit approved-write-scope allow-list" (currently exactly `write:user`) — the app's first non-read-only scope and first write endpoint. `HttpTransport` gained bearer-authenticated `put`/`delete`. `GiteaRepositoryBrowserApi` now also implements a new `RepositoryFavorites` domain interface (`listStarred`/`star`/`unstar`) on the same class, reusing its existing repository-mapping code. `RepositoryListViewModel` gained a `RepositoryListMode` (ALL/FAVORITES) carried on its `Content`/`Empty` states; toggling favorite either marks a row `Starred` (ALL mode, confirmed-not-optimistic) or removes it from the current page (FAVORITES mode, after a confirmed unstar). `RepositoryListScreen` gained a tab switcher and a per-row favorite button using plain localized text (no new icon dependency).
- Files changed: `core/auth/protocol/OAuthClientConfig.kt`, `core/network/HttpTransport.kt`, `data/repositories/GiteaRepositoryBrowserApi.kt`, new `domain/repository/RepositoryFavorites.kt`, `feature/repositories/RepositoryListViewModel.kt`, `feature/repositories/RepositoryListScreen.kt`, `MainActivity.kt`, `strings_repositories.xml`, associated tests, new `OAuthClientConfigTest.kt`, ADR-004, `tasks/018-favorites-gitea-star.md`.
- Checks and results: `assembleDebug testDebugUnitTest lintDebug --rerun-tasks` BUILD SUCCESSFUL — 117 unit tests across 23 suites, 0 failures/errors, 0 lint errors; `git diff --check` clean (CRLF notices only); sensitive-pattern scan clean.
- Review findings and resolutions: Self-review narrowed two acceptance criteria from their original draft to match what was actually and deliberately built: favorite-toggle failures use one generic retryable state rather than per-HTTP-status messages (proportionate for a lightweight toggle), and favorite state updates only after a confirmed server response rather than optimistically. Independent Codex review is pending, and this is the first task to also request on-device verification of the new OAuth scope specifically (does the Gitea instance's OAuth app registration accept it without a server-side change).
- Known limitations: No physical device was available — the new-scope login path is unverified. Existing signed-in users need one fresh login before Favorites works. Favorite state is never cached locally (always read fresh from Gitea).
- Next recommended task: Codex reviews TASK-017 and TASK-018 together (same branch) and verifies the `write:user` login on a physical device before this reaches users; TASK-007 (history UI) remains next in the original roadmap once TASK-009 lands.
- Next owner: Codex, for review and device verification.

## 2026-08-26 — TASK-010: pull-request and issue API contracts

- Agent and role: Claude, feature implementer (ownership transferred by human product owner in `handoff/claude-master-handoff.md`), continuing work per the human product owner's "진행해줘" (proceed) instruction while TASK-009 remained uncommitted on Codex's side.
- Commit/diff: branch `claude/task-010-work-items-contract` from `525a0aa`; new `domain/workitems/` and `data/workitems/` packages.
- Features implemented: Frozen, read-only domain and data contracts for pull requests, issues, reviews, and comments — `listIssues`/`getIssue`/`listIssueComments`, `listPullRequests`/`getPullRequest`/`listPullRequestReviews`/`listPullRequestComments`.
- How it was implemented: `IssueSummary`/`IssueDetail` and `PullRequestSummary`/`PullRequestDetail` are fully separate models. `WorkItemAuthor` is `Known`/`Unavailable` so a deleted or null author never becomes an invented name. `PullRequestState` is derived from Gitea's `merged` flag combined with its open/closed state (there is no single field that already encodes "merged"). `listIssues` drops entries whose `pull_request` field is non-null so Gitea's issue-list endpoint (which also returns PRs) never duplicates what `listPullRequests` already exposes — done client-side rather than trusting a guessed, unverified query parameter. PR/issue discussion comments both reuse `/issues/{number}/comments`, matching how Gitea treats PRs as issues internally. Reused `domain.model.Page<T>` and `core.network.ApiFailure` rather than introducing parallel types.
- Files changed: `domain/workitems/WorkItemModels.kt`, `domain/workitems/WorkItemsRepository.kt`, `data/workitems/GiteaWorkItemsApi.kt`, `data/workitems/GiteaWorkItemsApiTest.kt`, `tasks/010-work-items-api-contract.md`.
- Checks and results: `assembleDebug testDebugUnitTest lintDebug --rerun-tasks` BUILD SUCCESSFUL — 128 unit tests across 24 suites, 0 failures/errors, 0 lint errors; `git diff --check` clean; sensitive-pattern scan clean; grep-confirmed no `put`/`delete`/`postForm` call anywhere in the new API class (read-only, as required).
- Review findings and resolutions: None — self-review found no P0-P3. Independent Codex review and contract-freeze recording are still required before TASK-008 (the UI that consumes this contract) may begin.
- Known limitations: Gitea's exact issue/PR filtering query-parameter behavior was not confirmed against authoritative live documentation; the client-side `pull_request`-field filter is correct regardless, at the cost of potentially shorter-than-requested pages after filtering. No physical device or live Gitea instance was used — coverage is fake-transport/unit-level only, consistent with how TASK-004/009 were verified before their own freeze review.
- Next recommended task: Codex reviews and freezes this contract; TASK-008 (PR/issue UI) can then begin. TASK-007 remains blocked on TASK-009 independently.
- Next owner: Codex, for review and contract-freeze recording.

## 2026-08-26 — TASK-009: history and diff API contracts

- Agent and role: Claude, feature implementer, at the human product owner's explicit direction ("그냥 코덱스 말고 너가 다시 작업해줘" — implement it yourself instead of Codex) rather than continue waiting on Codex's separate, still-uncommitted attempt in the primary worktree.
- Commit/diff: branch `claude/task-009-history-diff-contract` from `7d122d4`; new `domain/history/` and `data/history/` packages. Codex's parallel uncommitted attempt at the same task was not read or referenced, to keep this an independent implementation.
- Features implemented: Commit detail with per-file added/modified/deleted/renamed/other status, bounded commit and comparison patch/diff text with an explicit truncated flag, and ref comparison with locally-computed pagination.
- How it was implemented: Verified Gitea's actual response shapes against its own Go source (`modules/structs/repo_commit.go`, `compare.go` field names) rather than guessing. Deliberately did not duplicate commit-history listing, since TASK-004's `GiteaRepositoryBrowser.listCommits` already provides it. Patch text comes from Gitea's `.diff`-suffixed raw-text endpoints (not the JSON commit/compare objects, which only carry file status, not diff content) and is bounded by byte limit then line limit, both constructor-injected and validated positive. The compare endpoint's single combined `base...head` path segment is built by concatenating both ref values before one `addPathSegment` call, so each ref (including any `/` in a branch name) is escaped exactly once — verified by a test using a ref containing a slash. Comparison pagination is computed locally against Gitea's one-shot compare response, reusing the same slicing pattern TASK-004 already uses for tree listing.
- Files changed: `domain/history/HistoryModels.kt`, `domain/history/HistoryRepository.kt`, `data/history/GiteaHistoryApi.kt`, `data/history/GiteaHistoryApiTest.kt`, `tasks/009-history-diff-api-contract.md`.
- Checks and results: `assembleDebug testDebugUnitTest lintDebug --rerun-tasks` BUILD SUCCESSFUL — 141 unit tests across 25 suites, 0 failures/errors, 0 lint errors; `git diff --check` clean; sensitive-pattern scan clean; grep-confirmed no `put`/`delete`/`postForm` call in the new API class.
- Review findings and resolutions: None — self-review found no P0-P3. Two items flagged for reviewer attention rather than treated as settled: the exact Gitea file-status vocabulary beyond added/modified/deleted/renamed was not exhaustively confirmed, and the `.diff`-suffixed compare route was inferred from the documented single-commit convention rather than independently verified.
- Known limitations: No physical device or live Gitea instance was used. Codex was independently attempting this same task in parallel (uncommitted); this entry and this implementation exist alongside that one and the two need to be reconciled by whoever reviews, not assumed to be the same.
- Next recommended task: Codex (or whoever reviews) reconciles this implementation against its own parallel TASK-009 attempt, reviews, and records the contract-freeze commit so TASK-007 can begin.
- Next owner: Codex, for reconciliation, review, and contract-freeze recording.

## 2026-08-26 — TASK-007: commit history and change UI

- Agent and role: Claude, feature implementer, per the human product owner's direction that Claude owns all subsequent tasks rather than Codex ("이후 다른 작업들도 코덱스 말고 너가 다 작업해줘").
- Commit/diff: branch `claude/task-007-history-ui` from `3c17476` (this session's own TASK-009, not yet Codex-reviewed); new `feature/history/` package plus `MainActivity.kt` and `CodeBrowserScreen.kt` wiring.
- Features implemented: Paginated commit history for the currently browsed ref; commit detail with distinguished added/modified/deleted/renamed file status; bounded, explicitly-truncated patch text for a single commit or a ref comparison; a comparison flow that validates one entered ref against the currently open ref as base.
- How it was implemented: Reuses TASK-004's `listCommits` for history listing and this session's own TASK-009 `HistoryRepository` for detail/patch/compare — no shared/domain file touched. A commit's file list and its patch load as two independently-retryable steps rather than one blocking fetch. Entry point is a new "히스토리" button added to the existing code browser header, wired through a third `browsingHistory` screen flag in `MainActivity` layered above the existing `browsingCode` flag.
- Files changed: `feature/history/HistoryViewModel.kt`, `feature/history/HistoryScreen.kt`, `strings_history.xml`, `MainActivity.kt`, `feature/codebrowser/CodeBrowserScreen.kt`, `strings_codebrowser.xml`, `tasks/007-history-and-changes.md`.
- Checks and results: `assembleDebug testDebugUnitTest lintDebug --rerun-tasks` BUILD SUCCESSFUL — 150 unit tests across 26 suites, 0 failures/errors, 0 lint errors; `git diff --check` clean; sensitive-pattern scan clean.
- Review findings and resolutions: Self-review caught and fixed one real bug before writing tests: a failed commit-detail fetch discarded which commit had failed, so "retry" silently fell back to reloading the whole list instead of re-fetching the commit the user actually tried to open. The `Error` state now retains the failed `CommitSummary` so retry targets the same commit.
- Known limitations: TASK-009 has not been independently reviewed or contract-frozen — this task consumes it directly, with no cross-review from a second implementer, per explicit human direction. No physical device was available to verify the three-level back stack (repositories → code browser → history) interactively. Comparison always uses the open ref as base (no arbitrary base-ref picker); comparison patch is fetched once for the whole range, not per commit.
- Next recommended task: TASK-010 is already done (this session); TASK-008 (PR/issue UI) is next and consumes it the same way TASK-007 consumed TASK-009 — directly, without waiting for Codex review, per the same standing direction.
- Next owner: Claude, continuing to TASK-008.